Home » Work From Home in Victoria: What Could the Proposed Changes Mean for Employers?
September 10, 2026-
Founder and Managing DirectorNatasha is a leading HR expert, entrepreneur, author and sought-after media commentator for outlets such as Sunrise (Channel 7), ABC Radio and The Australian Financial Review. Natasha co-founded Employee Matters in 2011 to help Australian businesses achieve success through their people.
Work from home in Victoria is once again in the spotlight, with proposed changes prompting discussion about workplace flexibility, employee expectations and what the future of work could look like.
Employee Matters Managing Director Natasha Hawker recently joined Channel 7’s Sunrise to discuss Victoria’s proposed Work-From-Home Bill, flexible working arrangements and what the changes could mean for Victorian workplaces.
Watch Natasha’s full Sunrise interview below for her HR perspective.

The discussion around working from home continues to evolve as employers consider how workplace flexibility fits within their business and people strategies.
For Natasha, one of the key issues is certainty.
With questions being raised about how the proposed Victorian changes interact with existing workplace requirements, businesses may be left uncertain about what the changes could mean for their current policies and working arrangements.
As Natasha explained on Sunrise, this uncertainty can create challenges for business owners who are already managing changing economic and workplace conditions. For employers, the practical question is not simply whether employees should work from home. It is how flexible working arrangements can work effectively within their organisation.
Not Every Role Can Be Done From Home
Working from home is not practical for every role or industry. Nurses, police, hospitality workers, tradies and many other employees need to be physically present to perform their jobs.
However, for roles where working remotely is practical, flexibility can form an important part of the employee experience. The challenge for employers is finding an approach that recognises the different requirements of different roles while still supporting their people and business.
Work From Home and Attracting Talent
Flexible working arrangements can also play a role in recruitment and retention.
As Natasha highlighted during her Sunrise interview, candidates often ask about working from home when considering a new role. For some jobseekers, the availability of flexible or hybrid working can influence whether they decide to apply.
This means employers need to consider how their approach to flexibility affects their ability to attract and retain talent, particularly in roles where remote or hybrid work is possible. Rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach, businesses should consider the nature of the role, operational requirements, team collaboration, productivity, employee expectations and workplace culture.
What Does This Mean for the Future of Work in Victoria?
Victoria’s proposed work-from-home changes are part of a broader conversation about how Australian workplaces are evolving. For employers, the focus should be on developing practical working arrangements that support their people while meeting the needs of the organisation and its customers.
There is no single approach that will work for every business. A flexible working model that works well for one organisation may not be suitable for another. As workplace requirements and employee expectations continue to change, employers should regularly review whether their current approach to flexible working is helping them attract, engage and retain the people they need.
Watch Natasha Hawker’s full Sunrise interview above for her HR perspective on work from home in Victoria and the proposed changes.
Need Support Navigating Workplace Change?
Workplace requirements and employee expectations are constantly changing. For business owners and managers, keeping up with these changes while managing people, performance and business priorities can be challenging.
At Employee Matters, we provide practical HR support to help businesses navigate workplace change, understand what changes may mean for their people and processes, and put effective HR strategies in place.
Need help navigating workplace change? Get in touch with Employee Matters.
News Anchor: Only six weeks into the job, Victorian Premier Ben Carroll is already facing a High Court challenge over his contentious work-from-home laws. The bill will give employees the right to work from home two days a week if they reasonably can, but legal advisors say it's unconstitutional, creating a potentially unfair two-tier system for workers. The Premier made a number of amendments to the bill overnight but refuses to scrap it despite growing calls. For more, we're joined by Natasha Hawker, HR Specialist and Managing Director of Employee Matters. Good morning to you. Should it be scrapped, do you think?
Natasha Hawker: I don't know whether it should be scrapped, but I think we do need to make sure that we've worked out the legal ambiguity at the moment. The issue that we've got is that there are some lawyers that believe that this legislation that they're trying to push through now is in conflict with the federal Fair Work Act. There are other lawyers that believe that act actually has some flexibility around benefits. That is where the issue is. However, I'm not a lawyer, so I'm going to leave that to the courts and the legal system. However, what I would say is this is causing enormous ambiguity, and people are unsure of what that means. And as a business owner, when you're trying to get a business up and running—and let's face it, in Melbourne, they've had a lot of challenges—this ambiguity is a problem.
News Anchor: In your opinion, the idea of a two-tier system, where it's potentially unfair for nurses, police, hospitality workers because they can't work from home?
Natasha Hawker: You're absolutely right. And there are certain roles like the police and tradies and nurses that cannot work from home. But I don't believe that necessarily means we should throw it out. There are certain roles that can be done from home very, very well. And it's important to offer that flexibility, and I can guarantee you those organizations that do attract the best talent. Those people that come to us for a job, often their first question is, "Can I work from home?" and they will not even put an application in if they can't.
News Anchor: Just looking at business leaders are warning that the laws could push jobs and investment out of the state potentially, and even worse, overseas. What's your take on that?
Natasha Hawker: I don't think we're seeing that yet, and I don't think that will necessarily be the case. Again, I think that transition to push that overseas takes time, and to get back to the same levels of performance that you might necessarily get in Australia would be an issue.
News Anchor: Okay, thanks for coming in. Appreciate it.
If you are a business owner or manager looking to improve your company's HR practices, book a Discovery Session with Employee Matters and let us show you how we can help you create business success through your people:
Get in Touch
Tell us a bit about your business and we’ll be in touch to:
- Understand the challenges that are holding your team or growth back
- Show you how our embedded HR and Recruitment Experts can solve problems faster, without the overheads
- Identify high-impact areas where HR and Recruitment support could save you time, stress and money
- Map out a tailored approach based on your goals, industry and internal capabilities
Alternatively, you can call us on (02) 8021 4206.

Australian Employee Relations Legislation Resource Hub
There is a significant amount of mandatory Employment Relations legislative change that impacts you and every other business in Australia now. Our resource hub is designed to help you understand these wide-ranging changes.
Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act
Access this concise Closing Loopholes Bill summary and guide detailing the proposed changes to the Fair Work Act, and the implications for employers:

